Continued Confinement of Those Most Vulnerable to COVID-19

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 30 (3):401-418 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Continued confinement of those most vulnerable to COVID-19—e.g., the elderly, those with chronic diseases and other risk factors—is presented as an uncontroversial measure when planning exit strategies from lockdown measures. Policies for deconfinement assume that these persons will remain confined even when others will not. This, however, could last quite a long time, and for some this could mean that they will remain in confinement for the rest of their lives.In a policy brief on ethical, legal, and social issues of transition strategies, the Swiss national COVID-19 science task force stated that:Specific interventions should target the risks associated with isolation...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lockdown, public good and equality during COVID-19.Lucy Frith - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):713-714.
COVID-19 Ethics—Looking Down the Muzzle.Grant Gillett - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):501-502.
How Many Have Died?S. Andrew Schroeder - 2020 - Issues in Science and Technology.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-14

Downloads
21 (#720,615)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samia Hurst
University of Geneva

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references