Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):325-326 (2019)
AbstractThis article draws the attention of research managers and policy makers to the issue that to become a science power curtailing misconduct is the daunting challenge that emerging countries simply cannot ignore. Systematic and orchestrated efforts are needed to foster and institutionalize research integrity education among all stakeholders.
Similar books and articles
Research Integrity in China: Problems and Prospects.Weiqin Zeng & David Resnik - 2010 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (3):164-171.
Research Integrity in Greater China: Surveying Regulations, Perceptions and Knowledge of Research Integrity From a Hong Kong Perspective.Sara R. Jordan & Phillip W. Gray - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):125-137.
Research Integrity in China: Problems and Prospects.David Resnik Weiqin Zeng - 2010 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (3):164-171.
Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research.Kenneth D. Pimple - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191-205.
Research Integrity in Greater China: Surveying Regulations, Perceptions and Knowledge of Research Integrity From a Hong Kong Perspective.Phillip W. Gray Sara R. Jordan - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):125-137.
Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.Simon Godecharle, Benoit Nemery & Kris Dierickx - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1421-1436.
Scientific Retractions and Corrections Related to Misconduct Findings.David B. Resnik & Gregg E. Dinse - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (1):46-50.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
The Role of Scientific Associations in Promoting Research Integrity and Deterring Research Misconduct: Commentary on ‘Challenges in Studying the Effects of Scientific Societies on Research Integrity’.Melissa S. Anderson & Joseph B. Shultz - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):269-272.
Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice.Saadia Mahmud & Tracey Bretag - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (6):1657-1672.
Scientific Societies and Research Integrity: What Are They Doing and How Well Are They Doing It?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
Empirical Developments in Retraction.B. K. Redman, H. N. Yarandi & J. F. Merz - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807-809.
Closing the Barn Door: Coping with Findings of Research Misconduct by Trainees in the Biomedical Sciences.Barbara K. Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (3):124-132.
Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has Not Been Accomplished?Nicholas H. Steneck - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Retraction: The “Other Face” of Research Collaboration?Li Tang, Guangyuan Hu, Yang Sui, Yuhan Yang & Cong Cao - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1681-1708.
China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What Are the Consequences for Global Science?Fei Shu, Sichen Liu & Vincent Larivière - 2022 - Minerva 60 (3):329-347.
The Effects of Anti-Corruption Campaign on Research Grant Reimbursement: Regression Discontinuity Evidence From China.Li Tang, Cong Cao, Donald Lien & Xiaoou Liu - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3415-3436.
References found in this work
Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers.Lei Lei & Ying Zhang - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1409-1420.