Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):658-662 (2011)
AbstractTheoretical and empirical research in bioethics frequently focuses on ethical dilemmas or problems. This paper draws on anthropological and phenomenological sources to develop an alternative framework for bioethical enquiry that allows examination of a broader range of how the moral is experienced in the everyday lives of individuals and groups. Our account of moral experience is subjective and hermeneutic. We define moral experience as “Encompassing a person's sense that values that he or she deem important are being realised or thwarted in everyday life. This includes a person's interpretations of a lived encounter, or a set of lived encounters, that fall on spectrums of right-wrong, good-bad or just-unjust”. In our conceptualisation, moral experience is not limited to situations that are heavily freighted with ethically-troubling ramifications or are sources of debate and disagreement. Important aspects of moral experience are played out in mundane and everyday settings. Moral experience provides a research framework, the scope of which extends beyond the evaluation of ethical dilemmas, processes of moral justification and decision-making, and moral distress. This broad research focus is consistent with views expressed by commentators within and beyond bioethics who have called for deeper and more sustained attention in bioethics scholarship to a wider set of concerns, experiences and issues that better captures what is ethically at stake for individuals and communities. In this paper we present our conceptualisation of moral experience, articulate its epistemological and ontological foundations and discuss opportunities for empirical bioethics research using this framework
Similar books and articles
Accounting for context: Future directions in bioethics theory and research.Darleen Douglas-Steele & Edward M. Hundert - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (2).
Even stranger still: Moral experience as a significant focus for research ethics consultation.Stuart G. Finder - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):22 – 23.
A Framework to Link International Clinical Research to the Promotion of Justice in Global Health.Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):387-396.
Quality of scholarship in bioethics.Baruch A. Brody - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):161-178.
Inclusion of Adolescent Women in Microbicide Trials: A Public Health Imperative!S. Pomfret, Q. A. Karim & S. R. Benatar - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (1):39-50.
What conception of moral truth works in bioethics?Richard W. Momeyer - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):403 – 416.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Bioethics Must Exemplify a Clear Path toward Justice: A Call to Action.Keisha Ray, Folasade C. Lapite, Shameka Poetry Thomas & Faith Fletcher - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (1):14-16.
Nurses’ moral experiences of assisted death: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research.James Elmore, David Kenneth Wright & Maude Paradis - 2018 - Nursing Ethics 25 (8):955-972.
Recognizing Children as Agents: Taylor’s Hermeneutical Ontology and the Philosophy of Childhood.Franco A. Carnevale - 2021 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29 (5):791-808.
Ethical considerations related to participation and partnership: an investigation of stakeholders' perceptions of an action-research project on user fee removal for the poorest in Burkina Faso.Matthew R. Hunt, Patrick Gogognon & Valéry Ridde - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):13.
Stories Worth Telling: Moral Experiences of Suicidal Behavior.Scott J. Fitzpatrick - 2014 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 4 (2):147-160.
References found in this work
59. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity.Charles Taylor - 1989 - In Bernard Williams (ed.), Essays and Reviews: 1959-2002. Princeton University Press. pp. 301-311.
The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics.Pascal Borry, Paul Schotsmans & Kris Dierickx - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (1):49–71.
Appropriate methodologies for empirical bioethics: It's all relative.Jonathan Ives & Heather Draper - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (4):249-258.