Abstract

Science, scientific or academic, it is essentially a "method" and "System"; "method" refers to the "form" side, "system" refers to the "content" side. And science is a system of knowledge, which is made ​​by the proper method of science as a methodical, with a common, inevitable feature of the whole, and its development possible. Kant's transcendental philosophy, that is, the critique of knowledge, science is possible to establish the conditions. However, the starting point of Kant's transcendental philosophy - imaging - no errors, but, imaging to be "objective", that is to be associated with the "absolute" and is limited, that is: the objective imaging. Kant was cut off this layer of association, only by an empty concept - the concept of rationality - to ensure the integrity of the system to judge. New Scholastic philosophy of transcendental method, that is, for Kant's transcendental philosophy and method of this shortcoming and to do further development. Science is essentially a "method" and a "system"; the "method" refers to "form" and the "system" refers to "content". Science, by way of correct method, makes itself an orderly whole, with the qualities of generality, necessity, and developmental possibility, which makes science systematic knowledge. Kant's transcendental philosophy lies on the basis of the critique of knowledge, it attempts to establish the conditions in which science is possible. Nothing is wrong with the starting point of Kant's transcendental philosophy-appearance-; it is only that appearance must be in connection with the "absolute" and limited in order to be "objective", that is to say "objective appearance". Kant separated this connection through a hollow concept of the "rational idea "in order to ensure the integration of a judgmental system. The Neo-Scholastic transcendental method aims at the deficiencies of Kant's transcendental method in an attempt to further develop it