What is Different about Socially Responsible Funds? A Holdings-Based Analysis

Journal of Business Ethics 138 (2):263-277 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We provide a comprehensive analysis of differences between socially responsible investment and conventional funds in terms of manager characteristics, performance and fund styles. We use holdings-based analysis to evaluate fund performance and style, which allows us to perform a more in-depth analysis than the extant literature. We find that SRI managers have longer tenure and are more likely to be a female. However, these differences do not result in any significant difference in the performance of SRI and conventional funds. Further, it is possible to find an SRI fund of any style, although these funds are under-represented in value styles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does it Really Hurt to be Responsible?Jacquelyn E. Humphrey & David T. Tan - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 122 (3):375-386.
Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW]D. Bruce Johnsen - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):219 - 222.
How new is socially responsible investment?Robert Taylor - 2000 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 9 (3):174–179.
Ethical (sri) funds in italy: A review.Silvana Signori - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (2):145-164.
Socially responsible (ethical) investing in South Africa.S. Viviers - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
68 (#231,141)

6 months
21 (#116,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Conclusion.[author unknown] - 1926 - Archives de Philosophie 4 (3):112.
Socially Responsible Mutual Funds.[author unknown] - 2003 - Business Ethics: The Magazine of Corporate Responsibility 17 (1):19-19.

Add more references