The sage of Kingston : John Watson and the ambiguity of Hegelianism
AbstractJohn Watson's thought has not been well understood. A question suggested by previous scholarship, namely, how successful was he at his task of re-founding the Christian religion on a philosophical base? is answered first in terms of consistency with the theological tradition. His revision of Christian theology is found to be inadequate by traditional standards; it is then examined as a philosophy of religion which, to his mind, overcame the difficulties of classical theism. It is argued that, despite some advantages, his philosophy of religion is deficient in two respects. First, its method is vitiated by a strained and sometimes mistaken interpretation of the philosophical tradition, indicative of arbitrariness. Second, "Speculative Idealism" as the result of that method reveals conceptual ambiguities corresponding to the ambiguities of classical theism. As the method is not self-evident and is used implicitly by Watson, and the results are philosophically ambiguous, the appropriation of this thought was theologically or philosophically shallow. Though Watson's thought, as far as it was understood, provided an underpinning for the "social gospel" movement in Canada, it is argued that this shallow appropriation explains, at least in part, the brevity of its appeal as philosophy of religion.
Similar books and articles
Philosophical Essays, Presented to John Watson.John Watson (ed.) - 1922 - Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
Unelementary Watson Alan Watson: Law Making in the Later Roman Republic. Pp.Xii + 211. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974. Cloth, £5·25. [REVIEW]John Crook - 1976 - The Classical Review 26 (01):85-86.
Book Review:The Philosophical Basis of Religion. John Watson. [REVIEW]David Phillips - 1909 - International Journal of Ethics 19 (2):248-.
Kesarcodi-Watson on Digby on Kesarcodi-Watson.Ian Kesarcodi-Watson - 1981 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (1):125-127.
Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism.Amir Dastmalchian - 2009 - International Journal of Hekmat 1:75-89.
The Limits of Evil and the Role of Moral Address: A Defense of Strawsonian Compatibilism. [REVIEW]Michael S. McKenna - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (2):123-142.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Thomas Carlyle, Scotland's Migrant Philosophers, and Canadian Idealism, C. 1870–1914.Alexander Jordan - 2021 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 19 (1):39-56.
References found in this work
Abstract.[author unknown] - 2011 - Dialogue and Universalism 21 (4):9-9.
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.David Hume - 1779/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophical Review. Blackwell. pp. 338-339.