Self‐Assembling Systems

Philosophy of Science 73 (5):595-604 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Starting with the view that methodological constraints depend upon the nature of the system investigated, a tripartite division between theoretical, semitheoretical, and empirical discoveries is made. Many nanosystems can only be investigated semitheoretically or empirically, and this aspect leads to some nanophenomena being weakly emergent. Self-assembling systems are used as an example, their existence suggesting that the class of systems that is not Kim-reducible may be quite large.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assembling (Post)modernism. [REVIEW]Michael Gardiner - 1999 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 3 (1):130-133.
Assembling matches: A simple Manu-motor test.E. Ronald Walker & W. J. Weedon - 1927 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):144 – 149.
Conceptual and Derivation Systems.Jiří Raclavský & Petr Kuchyňka - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):159-174.
Systems of ordering data.Ernst Mayr - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):419-434.
Complexly organised dynamical systems.John D. Collier & Clifford A. Hooker - 1999 - Open Systems and Information Dynamics 6 (3):241–302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#344,726)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Humphreys
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Making sense of emergence.Jaegwon Kim - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 95 (1-2):3-36.

Add more references