Did Cantor need set theory?

In Stephen Simpson (ed.), Reverse Mathematics 2001. pp. 21--244 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Cantor's grundlagen and the paradoxes of set theory.William Tait - manuscript
Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox.Christopher Menzel - 1984 - The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Cohesive toposes and Cantor's 'lauter einsen'.F. W. Lawvere - 1994 - Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1):5-15.
The Motives Behind Cantor’s Set Theory: Physical, biological and philosophical questions.José Ferreirós - 2004 - Science in Context 17 (1/2):1–35.
Constructing Cantorian counterexamples.George Boolos - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (3):237-239.
Constructive Versus Ontological Construals of Cantorian Ordinals.Wolfram Hinzen - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (1):45-63.
A Negation-free Proof of Cantor's Theorem.N. Raja - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (2):231-233.
Taming the infinite.A. W. Moore - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):53-56.
Did Georg Cantor influence Edmund Husserl?Claire Ortiz Hill - 1997 - Synthese 113 (1):145-170.
Rank, join, and Cantor singletons.Jim Owings - 1997 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (4-5):313-320.
Wittgenstein’s analysis on Cantor’s diagonal argument.Chaohui Zhuang - manuscript
Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite.Joseph Warren Dauben - 1979 - Hup.
An Intuitionistic Version of Cantor's Theorem.Dario Maguolo & Silvio Valentini - 1996 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 42 (1):446-448.
x2. Cantor's proof. The authors of these papers—henceforth let me call them just the authors—seem to have read Cantor's argument in a variety of places. In my records only one author refers directly to Cantor's own argument [7]. One quotes Russell's 'Principles of mathematics'[20] later. [REVIEW]Wilfrid Hodges - 1998 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references