Data Analysis: Models or Techniques? [Book Review]

Foundations of Science 18 (3):579-581 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary to Napoletani et al. (Found Sci 16:1–20, 2011), we argue that the approach the authors adopt suggests that neural nets are mathematical techniques rather than models of cognitive processing, that the general approach dates as far back as Ptolemy, and that applied mathematics is more than simply applying results from pure mathematics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Data models and the acquisition and manipulation of data.Todd Harris - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.
Informational privacy, data mining, and the internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
Mental models in data interpretation.Clark A. Chinn & William F. Brewer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):219.
Constructible models of subsystems of ZF.Richard Gostanian - 1980 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (2):237-250.
Deciding on the Data: Epistemological Problems Surrounding Instruments and Research Techniques in Cell Biology.William Bechtel - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:167 - 178.
Data without models merging with models without data.Ulrich Krohs & Werner Callebaut - 2007 - In Fred C. Boogerd, Frank J. Bruggeman, Jan-Hendrik S. Hofmeyr & Hans V. Westerhoff (eds.), Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations. Elsevier. pp. 181--213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-23

Downloads
61 (#259,066)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Humphreys
University of Virginia

References found in this work

Add more references