What’s Wrong with Invisible-Hand Explanations?

Philosophy of Science 64 (4):126 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An invisible hand seems to play an important role in science. In this paper I set out the general structure of invisible-hand explanations, counter some objections that have been raised to them, and detail the role that they play in science. The most important issue is the character of the mechanisms that are supposed to bring about invisible-hand effects

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
194 (#98,896)

6 months
45 (#86,854)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Group Inquiry.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (3):1099-1123.
The credit incentive to be a maverick.Remco Heesen - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 76:5-12.
Moral trust & scientific collaboration.Karen Frost-Arnold - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):301-310.
Policing epistemic communities.Justin P. Bruner - 2013 - Episteme 10 (4):403-416.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations