What philosophy of biology is not

Synthese 20 (2):157 - 184 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Essay Review: What Philosophy of Biology Is Not.David Hull - 1969 - Journal of the History of Biology 2 (1):241 - 268.
The philosophy of biology.David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) - 1973 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Biology and philosophy in yellowstone.Holmes Rolston - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (2):241-258.
David Hull: A memoir.Michael Ruse - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):739-747.
Recent philosophy of biology: A review.David L. Hull - 2002 - Acta Biotheoretica 50 (2):117-128.
Philosophy of Biology.Andrew Hamilton, Samir Okasha & Jay Odenbaugh - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 184–212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#180,416)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Two evolutionary theories (1).Marjorie Grene - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (34):110-127.
Two evolutionary theories (I).Marjorie Grene - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (34):110-127.
Functional explanation in biology.Hugh Lehman - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (1):1-20.
Two evolutionary theories (II).Marjorie Grene - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (35):185-193.
Clusters.Douglas Gasking - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):1 – 36.

View all 10 references / Add more references