Reduction in Genetics—Biology or Philosophy?
Philosophy of Science 39 (4):491-499 (1972)
Abstract
A belief common among philosophers and biologists alike is that Mendelian genetics has been or is in the process of being reduced to molecular genetics, in the sense of formal theory reduction current in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to show that there are numerous empirical and conceptual difficulties which stand in the way of establishing a systematic inferential relation between Mendelian and molecular genetics. These difficulties, however, have little to do with the traditional objections which have been raised to reductionMy notes
Similar books and articles
The supervenience of biological concepts.Alexander Rosenberg - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (3):368-386.
On the reduction of genetics to molecular biology.Steven Orla Kimbrough - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (3):389-406.
The Formal Structure of Genetics and the Reduction Problem.A. Lindenmayer & N. Simon - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:160 - 170.
Mechanism schemas and the relationship between biological theories.Tudor M. Baetu - 2011 - In Phyllis McKay Illari Federica Russo (ed.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
Why the antireductionist consensus won't survive the case of classical Mendelian genetics.C. Kenneth Waters - 1990 - Philosophy of Science Association 1:125-39.
Reduction and instrumentalism in genetics.Philip Gasper - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):655-670.
Structure and comparison of genetic theories: (2) the reduction of character-factor genetics to molecular genetics.W. Balzer & C. M. Dawe - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):177-191.
Heroic antireductionism and genetics: A tale of one science.Russell E. Vance - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):45.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
238 (#52,547)
6 months
4 (#184,707)
2009-01-28
Downloads
238 (#52,547)
6 months
4 (#184,707)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Neither Logical Empiricism nor Vitalism, but Organicism: What the Philosophy of Biology Was.Daniel J. Nicholson & Richard Gawne - 2015 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37 (4):345-381.
Nonreductive individualism: Part I—supervenience and wild disjunction.R. Keith Sawyer - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (4):537-559.
Eliminativism and Evolutionary Debunking.Jeffrey N. Bagwell - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8:496-522.
References found in this work
Patterns of Discovery.Norwood R. Hanson, A. D. Ritchie & Henryk Mehlberg - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):346-349.
Conjectures and Refutations.Karl R. Popper - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.
The Watson-Crick model and reductionism.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (4):325-348.