Offices and God

Sophia 29 (3):29-34 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pavel Tichy presents an interpretation of Anselm’s Proslogion III argument. Tichy presents an interpretation of this argument and raises doubts about one of the premises. The authors contend that Tichy’s interpretation of Anselm is wrong. The argument Tichy comes to raise doubts about is not Anselm’s.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Existence and God.Pavel Tichý - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (8):403-420.
Anselm's neglected argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
De dicto and de re.Pavel Tichý - 1978 - Philosophia 8 (1):1-16.
Verisimilitude revisited.Pavel Tichý - 1978 - Synthese 38 (2):175 - 196.
The transiency of truth.Pavel Tichý - 1980 - Theoria 46 (2-3):165-182.
The non-Christian influence on Anselm’s Proslogion argument.Nancy Kendrick - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):73-89.
Do we need interval semantics?Pavel Tichý - 1985 - Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (2):263 - 282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-28

Downloads
263 (#74,133)

6 months
44 (#88,477)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Hugly
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references