Null Sentences

Iyyun, The Jewish Philosophical Quarterly 48:23-36 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Tractatus, Wittgenstein held that there are null sentences – prominently including logical truths and the truths of mathematics. He says that such sentences are without sense (sinnlos), that they say nothing; he also denies that they are nonsensical (unsinning). Surely it is what a sentence says which is true or false. So if a sentence says nothing, how can it be true or false? The paper discusses the issue.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Truth-Makers.Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons & Barry Smith - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (3):287-321.
Questions.Peter Hanks - 2006 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 10. Detroit et al.: Thomson Gale. pp. 32-37.
The ethical residue of language in Levinas and early Wittgenstein.Søren Overgaard - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (2):223-249.
On the 'resolute' reading of the tractatus.John Koethe - 2003 - Philosophical Investigations 26 (3):187–204.
Analyticity and Genericness.Ryszard Zuber - 1978 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 6 (1):63-73.
Chow's defense of Null-hypothesis testing: Too traditional?Robert W. Frick - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):199-199.
On Gödel Sentences and What They Say.Peter Milne - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):193-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-28

Downloads
680 (#23,151)

6 months
109 (#33,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Hugly
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references