Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):378-387 (1997)
AbstractDavid Hunt has recently developed a new strategy, called the “dispositional omniscience scenario,” or (OOS), which is designed to defeat theological fatalism by showing the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human (libertarian) free agency. But I argue that Hunt fails to establish his compatibility claim because (DOS) is based on a defective analysis of dispositional belief that is too weak to sustain any divine foreknowledge of future free actions
Similar books and articles
Sunday School Student and Theological Fatalism.Mohammad Saleh Zarepour - 2013 - Sophia 52 (3):553-555.
On a theological argument for fatalism.Susan Haack - 1974 - Philosophical Quarterly 24 (95):156-159.
Human Freedom in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist-Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Creaturely Free Will.Christopher J. Kosciuk - unknown
Future freedom and the fixity of truth: closing the road to limited foreknowledge open theism. [REVIEW]Benjamin H. Arbour - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):189-207.
On the incompatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom.Jason Wyckoff - 2010 - Sophia 49 (3):333-41.
A Problem for Hasker: Freedom with Respect to the Present, Hard Facts, and Theological Incompatibilism.Michael Rota - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads