A Review of: “James Stacey Taylor, Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative”: Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2005. 225 pp. $29.95, paperback [Book Review]

American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):93-94 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Litmus Test for Exploitation: James Stacey Taylor's Stakes and Kidneys.J. R. Kuntz - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):552-572.
Black markets, transplant kidneys and interpersonal coercion.J. S. Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):698-701.
Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted.James Stacey Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):325-335.
From Directed Donation to Kidney Sale: Does the Argument Hold Up?James Stacey Taylor - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (5):597-614.
Moral Repugnance, Moral Distress, and Organ Sales.James Stacey Taylor - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (3):312-327.
Introduction: Markets and medicine. [REVIEW]James Stacey Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):149-154.
How Not to Argue for Markets.James Stacey Taylor - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (2):165-179.
Semiotic Arguments and Markets in Votes.James Stacey Taylor - 2017 - Business Ethics Journal Review 5 (6):35-39.
It’s My Body and I’ll Do What I Like With It.Anne Phillips - 2011 - Political Theory 39 (6):724-748.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
28 (#524,295)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Hughes
University of Michigan, Dearborn

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references