Paradox Lost: Logical Solutions to ten Puzzles of Philosophy

Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Paradox Lost covers ten of philosophy’s most fascinating paradoxes, in which seemingly compelling reasoning leads to absurd conclusions. The following paradoxes are included: The Liar Paradox, in which a sentence says of itself that it is false. Is the sentence true or false? The Sorites Paradox, in which we imagine removing grains of sand one at a time from a heap of sand. Is there a particular grain whose removal converts the heap to a non-heap? The Puzzle of the Self-Torturer, in which a series of seemingly rational choices has us accepting a life of excruciating pain, in exchange for millions of dollars. Newcomb’s Problem, in which we seemingly maximize our expected profit by taking an unknown sum of money, rather than taking the same sum plus $1000. The Surprise Quiz Paradox, in which a professor finds that it is impossible to give a surprise quiz on any particular day of the week... but also that if this is so, then a surprise quiz can be given on any day. The Two Envelope Paradox, in which we are asked to choose between two indistinguishable envelopes, and it is seemingly shown that each envelope is preferable to the other. The Ravens Paradox, in which observing a purple shoe provides evidence that all ravens are black. The Shooting Room Paradox, in which a deadly game kills 90% of all who play, yet each individual’s survival turns on the flip of a fair coin. Each paradox is clearly described, common mistakes are explored, and a clear, logical solution offered. Paradox Lost will appeal to professional philosophers, students of philosophy, and all who love intellectual puzzles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradox lost, paradox regained: Reply from a flagellated straw man.James V. Bradley - 1983 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (1):69-72.
Drange's paradox lost.J. Michael Dunn - 1967 - Philosophical Studies 18 (6):94 - 95.
Paradox regained.Theodore Drange - 1969 - Philosophical Studies 20 (4):61 - 64.
The Paradox of Knowability and Factivity.Michael Shaffer - 2014 - Polish Journal of Philiosophy 8 (1):85-91.
Paradox Lost, but in which Envelope?Olav Gjelsvik - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):353-362.
Fallibilism and the Lottery paradox.Baron Reed - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:217-225.
Paradox Lost.W. J. Huggett - 1958 - Analysis 19 (1):21 - 23.
Time and eternity: Paradox and structure in paradise lost.Rosalie L. Colie - 1960 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 23 (1/2):127-138.
Benardete's Paradox.Michael B. Burke - 1999 - Sorites 11:82-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-18

Downloads
40 (#389,966)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Huemer
University of Colorado, Boulder

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references