The limits of objective assessment of medical practice

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):487-496 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical work is increasingly being subjected to objective assessment as those who pay for it seek to grasp the quality of that work and how best to improve it. While objective measures have a role in the assessment of health care, I argue that this role is currently overestimated and that no human practice such as medicine can be fully comprehended by objective assessment. I suggest that the character of practices, in which formalizations are combined with judgment, requires that valid assessment involve the perspective of the skilled practitioner. Relying exclusively on objective measures in assessing health care will not only distort our assessments of it but lead to damage as the incentives of health care workers are directed away from the important aspects of their work that are not captured by objective measures.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Medicine and the market: equity v. choice.Daniel Callahan - 2006 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Edited by Angela A. Wasunna.
Futility and the varieties of medical judgment.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2):63-78.
A robust, particularist ethical assessment of medical tourism.Zahra Meghani - 2011 - Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):16-29.
Toward a More Objective Understanding of the Evidence of Carcinogenic Risk.Deborah G. Mayo - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:489 - 503.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
58 (#264,822)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?