Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (2013)

Authors
Robert Hudson
University of Saskatchewan
Abstract
In Seeing Things, Robert Hudson assesses a common way of arguing about observation reports called "robustness reasoning." Robustness reasoning claims that an observation report is more likely to be true if the report is produced by multiple, independent sources. Seeing Things argues that robustness reasoning lacks the special value it is often claimed to have. Hudson exposes key flaws in various popular philosophical defenses of robustness reasoning. This philosophical critique of robustness is extended by recounting five episodes in the history of science (from experimental microbiology, atomic theory, astrophysics, and astronomy) where robustness reasoning is — or could be claimed to have been — used. Hudson goes on to show that none of these episodes do in fact exhibit robustness reasoning. In this way, the significance of robustness reasoning is rebutted on both philosophical and historical grounds. But the book does more than critique robustness reasoning. It also develops a better defense of the informative value of observation reports. The book concludes by relating insights into the failure of robustness reasoning to a popular approach to scientific realism called "(theoretical) preservationism." Hudson argues that those who defend this approach to realism commit similar errors to those who advocate robustness reasoning. In turn, a new form of realism is formulated and defended. Called "methodological preservationism," it recognizes the fundamental value of naked-eye observation to scientists — and the rest of us.
Keywords Robustness reasoning  Realism  Experimental microbiology  Dark matter  Jean Perrin  Naked-eye observation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $47.98 new   $94.36 used   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9780199303281   0199303282   9780199303298
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Robustness and Reality.Markus I. Eronen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3961-3977.
The Multiple Dimensions of Multiple Determination.Klodian Coko - 2020 - Perspectives on Science 28 (4):505-541.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Epistemological Foundations of Scientific Observation.Vincent Israel-Jost - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):29-40.
Observation Reconsidered.Jerry Fodor - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (March):23-43.
Some Observations on a Popperian Experiment Concerning Observation.Robert Nola - 1990 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (2):329-346.
Unreliable Knowledge.John Turri - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):529-545.
Observation and Growth in Scientific Knowledge.Robert Nola - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:245 - 257.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-26

Total views
36 ( #316,073 of 2,507,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes