Humean Pleasures Reconsidered

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (4):545 - 562 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

TRADITIONAL INTERPRETATIONS OF HUME HAVE MISCONSTRUED HIS UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURE OF PLEASURE, AND HOW PLEASURE IS DEPLOYED IN HIS VALUE THEORY. I RECTIFY THIS STATE OF AFFAIRS BY EXPLICATING THE ROLE WHICH PLEASURE PLAYS IN JUDGMENTS OF VALUE ON THE HUMEAN ANALYSIS. IT IS SHOWN THAT PLEASURE HAS ALL THE FEATURES THAT MAKE IT RELEVANT TO VALUE THEORY AND MORAL PHILOSOPHY, THAT HUME'S UNDERSTANDING OF PLEASURE IS MUCH MORE SOPHISTICATED THAN HAS BEEN GENERALLY REALIZED, AND THAT HUME'S CONCEPTION OF PLEASURE IS WELL-INTEGRATED WITH HIS VALUE THEORY.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Six theses about pleasure.Stuart Rachels - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):247-267.
On pleasures.Olivier Massin - 2011 - Dissertation, Geneva
Thomas Aquinas on Sexual Pleasure.John Giles Milhaven - 1977 - Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (2):157 - 181.
The feels good theory of pleasure.Aaron Smuts - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):241-265.
Hedonism as the Explanation of Value.David Brax - 2009 - Dissertation, Lund University
The poetry and the pity: Hume's account of tragic pleasure.Elisa Galgut - 2001 - British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):411-424.
The Intentionality of Pleasures.Olivier Massin - 2013 - In Denis Fisette & Guillaume Fréchette (eds.), Themes from Brentano. New York, NY: Editions Rodopi. pp. 307-337.
Malicious pleasure evaluated: Is pleasure an unconditional good?Irwin Goldstein - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):24–31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
64 (#247,828)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sexual perversion.Thomas Nagel - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (1):5-17.

View all 6 references / Add more references