“Disease Entity” as the Key Theoretical Concept of Medicine

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (6):609-633 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical debates about the concept of disease, particularly of mental disease, might benefit from reconsideration and a closer look at the established terminology and conceptual structure of contemporary medical pathology and clinical nosology. The concepts and principles of medicine differ, to a considerable extent, from the ideas and notions of philosophical theories of disease. In medical theory, the concepts of disease entity and pathologicity are, besides the concept of disease itself, of fundamental importance, and they are essentially connected to the concepts cause of disease or etiological factor, natural course or natural history of disease, and pathological disposition. It is the concept of disease entity that is of key importance for understanding medical pathology and theory of disease. Its central role is shown by a short reconstruction of its main features and its intrinsic connection to the concept of pathologicity. The meaning of pathologicity is elucidated by explicating the underlying criteria

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A pathological view of disease.William E. Stempsey - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):321-330.
Do we need a concept of disease?Germund Hesslow - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
The social concept of disease.Juha Räikkä - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
The concept of disease: Structure and change.Paul Thagard - 1996 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 29 (3/4):445-478.
Chaos, Fractals, and Our Concept of Disease.Manuel Varela, Raul Ruiz-Esteban & Maria Jose Mestre De Juan - 2010 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):584-595.
The Geneticization of Diagnostics.William E. Stempsey - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (2):193-200.
Medical informatics and the concept of disease.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):85-100.
The significance of the concept of disease for justice in health care.Thomas Schramme - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Fuzzy health, illness, and disease.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):605 – 638.
The concept of disease—vague, complex, or just indefinable?Bjørn Hofmann - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (1):3-10.
The Prototype Resemblance Theory of Disease.K. Sadegh-Zadeh - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):106-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-27

Downloads
59 (#265,945)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Explanation in contexts of causal complexity : lessons from psychiatric genetics.Lauren N. Ross - 2023 - In William C. Bausman, Janella K. Baxter & Oliver M. Lean (eds.), From biological practice to scientific metaphysics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
The Dynamics of Disease: Toward a Processual Theory of Health.Thor Hennelund Nielsen - 2024 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 49 (3):271-282.
Diagnosis and Causal Explanation in Psychiatry.Hane Htut Maung - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 60 (C):15-24.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Health as a theoretical concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
A rebuttal on health.Christopher Boorse - 1997 - In James M. Humber & Robert F. Almeder (eds.), What is Disease? Humana Press. pp. 1--134.
The nature of disease.Lawrie Reznek - 1987 - New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
The myth of mental illness.Thomas S. Szasz - 2004 - In Arthur Caplan, James J. McCartney & Dominic A. Sisti (eds.), Ethics. Georgetown University Press. pp. 43--50.

View all 25 references / Add more references