Understanding Physics: ‘What?’, ‘Why?’, and ‘How?’

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-36 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I want to combine two hitherto largely independent research projects, scientific understanding and mechanistic explanations. Understanding is not only achieved by answering why-questions, that is, by providing scientific explanations, but also by answering what-questions, that is, by providing what I call scientific descriptions. Based on this distinction, I develop three forms of understanding: understanding-what, understanding-why, and understanding-how. I argue that understanding-how is a particularly deep form of understanding, because it is based on mechanistic explanations, which answer why something happens in virtue of what it is made of. I apply the three forms of understanding to two case studies: first, to the historical development of thermodynamics and, second, to the differences between the Clausius and the Boltzmann entropy in explaining thermodynamic processes.

Similar books and articles

Time in Thermodynamics.Jill North - 2011 - In Criag Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 312--350.
The past histories of molecules.Craig Callender - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 83--113.
Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation.Monte Johnson - 2017 - In J. Rocca (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: philosophical and medical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 125-150.
Reduction and renormalization.Robert Batterman - 2006 - In Gerhard Ernst & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Time, Chance and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 159--179.
Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics.Robert Batterman - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):225-244.
Aristotle and Foundation of Scientific Explanation.Mahdi Gavam Safari - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 2 (203):103-134.
Decoherence: The View from the History and the Philosophy of Science.Amit Hagar - 2012 - Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A 375 (1975).
The emergence and interpretation of probability in Bohmian mechanics.Craig Callender - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):351-370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-08

Downloads
413 (#44,915)

6 months
135 (#22,264)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mario Hubert
American University in Cairo

References found in this work

Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Physics.Daniel W. Aristotle & Graham - 2018 - Hackett Publishing Company.

View all 74 references / Add more references