Synthese 199:5255–5584 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Philosophers now seem to agree that frequentism is an untenable strategy to explain the meaning of probabilities. Nevertheless, I want to revive frequentism, and I will do so by grounding probabilities on typicality in the same way as the thermodynamic arrow of time can be grounded on typicality within statistical mechanics. This account, which I will call typicality frequentism, will evade the major criticisms raised against previous forms of frequentism. In this theory, probabilities arise within a physical theory from statistical behavior of almost all initial conditions. The main advantage of typicality frequentism is that it shows which kinds of probabilities can be derived from physics. Although one cannot recover all probability talk in this account, this is rather a virtue than a vice, because it shows which types of probabilities can in fact arise from physics and which types need to be explained in different ways, thereby opening the path for a pluralistic account of probabilities.
|
Keywords | frequentism probability typicality statistical mechanics |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2021 |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11229-021-03024-8 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science.Mary S. Morgan & Margaret Morrison (eds.) - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
View all 49 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Understanding physics: ‘What?’, ‘Why?’, and ‘How?’.Mario Hubert - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-36.
Similar books and articles
Operationism, Probability and Quantum Mechanics.Maria Carla Galavotti - 1995 - Foundations of Science 1 (1):99-118.
Remarks on the Idealist and Empiricist Interpretation of Frequentism: Robert Leslie Ellis Versus John Venn.Lukas M. Verburgt - 2014 - BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics 29 (3):184-195.
Bayes and Health Care Research.Peter Allmark - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (3):321-332.
“Mises Redux” — Redux: Fifteen Arguments Against Finite Frequentism.Alan Hájek - 1996 - Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):209--27.
Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation: Determinism, Indeterminism and Laws of Nature.Valia Allori (ed.) - 2020 - Singapore: World Scientific.
Justifying Typicality Measures of Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics and Dynamical Systems.Charlotte Werndl - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):470-479.
Introduction.Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press.
Naive Probability: Model‐Based Estimates of Unique Events.Sangeet S. Khemlani, Max Lotstein & Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (6):1216-1258.
Determinism and Chance.Barry Loewer - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):609-620.
Why Typicality Does Not Explain the Approach to Equilibrium.Roman Frigg - 2011 - In Mauricio Suárez (ed.), Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics. pp. 77-93.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-01-29
Total views
61 ( #188,845 of 2,518,158 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #37,548 of 2,518,158 )
2021-01-29
Total views
61 ( #188,845 of 2,518,158 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #37,548 of 2,518,158 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads