Discussion: Milne's Measure

Abstract

In his (1996) Peter Milne shows that r (H, E, B) = log [Pr (H | E ∩ B) / Pr (H | B)] is the one true measure of confirmation in the sense that r is the only function satisfying the following five constraints on measures of confirmation C.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Milne’s Argument for the Log‐Ratio Measure.Franz Huber - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (4):413-420.
Milne's measure of confirmation.Stephen Pollard - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):335–338.
Before cosmophysics: E.A. Milne on mathematics and physics.Helge Kragh & Simon Rebsdorf - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):35-50.
Professor Milne's Reply.E. A. Milne - 1942 - Philosophy 17 (65):78-.
Probability as a Measure of Information Added.Peter Milne - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (2):163-188.
Evidential support and undermining: Revision of håkan törnebohm's theory of confirmation. [REVIEW]Harald Dickson - 1990 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (1):163-182.
An exact measure of paradox.A. C. Paseau - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):17-26.
On universal semiregular invariant measures.Piotr Zakrzewski - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1170-1176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
28 (#555,203)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references