Anscombe on How St. Peter Intentionally Did What He Intended Not to Do

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):129-45 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

G. E. M. Anscombe’s Intention, meticulous in its detail and its structure, ends on a puzzling note. At its conclusion, Anscombe claims that when he denied Jesus, St. Peter intentionally did what he intended not to do. This essay will examine why Anscombe construes the case as she does and what it might teach us about the nature of practical rationality.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

10513558

DOI

10.5840/acpq2018124168

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Knowing Achievements.Alexander Stathopoulos - 2016 - Philosophy 91 (3):361-374.
Understanding 'Practical Knowledge'.John Schwenkler - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.
The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Intention.Rachael Wiseman - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.
Rational constraints and the Simple View.E. di Nucci - 2010 - Analysis 70 (3):481 - 486.
Intentionally Suffering?Charles Travis - forthcoming - In Michael O'Sullivan (ed.), ?? Oxford University Press.
The intentional and the intended.J. L. A. Garcia - 1990 - Erkenntnis 33 (2):191 - 209.
Philosophical Writings.René Descartes, G. E. M. Anscombe & P. T. Geach - 1966 - Nelson.
Advance directives, autonomy and unintended death.Jim Stone - 1994 - Bioethics 8 (3):223–246.
Virtues and intentions-Approach to learn a virtuous concept from Anscombe.Boris Hennig - 2008 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 115 (1):165-183.
Moral Truth and Moral Tradition: Essays in Honour of Peter Geach and Elizabeth Anscombe.Peter Thomas Geach, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe & Luke Gormally - 1994 - Four Courts Pressltd.
Double Effect, Means as an Intended Intentional Action Versus Side Effect as a Non-Intended Intentional Action and the Moral Relevance Involved.Jong-sik Reem - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Logic, cause & action: essays in honour of Elizabeth Anscombe.Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe & Roger Teichmann (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, going on to ethics.Cora Diamond - 2019 - London, England: Harvard University Press.
Thought and Reality.Elizabeth Anscombe - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):337-345.
Intention and intentionality: essays in honour of G. E. M. Anscombe.G. E. M. Anscombe, Jenny Teichman & Cora Diamond (eds.) - 1979 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-30

Downloads
105 (#163,094)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Hubbs
University of Idaho

Citations of this work

Protest and Speech Act Theory.Matthew Chrisman & Graham Hubbs - 2021 - In Rachel Katharine Sterken & Justin Khoo (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language. New York: Routledge. pp. 179-192.
Strong cognitivist weaknesses.Nathan Hauthaler - 2023 - Analytic Philosophy 64 (2):161-176.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references