"Why Be Moral?" and Other Matters: Reply to Liu, Tiwald, and Yu

Philosophy East and West 69 (1):295-310 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I would like to start by expressing my gratitude to Chenyang Li for proposing, organizing, and arranging the publication of this symposium discussion of my book, Why Be Moral? Learning from the Neo-Confucian Cheng Brothers. I would also like to thank Jeeloo Liu, Justin Tiwald, and Kam-por Yu for their serious engagements with my work with stimulating and inspiring comments. As they seem to me so persuasive, at the end of the day I would perhaps have to embrace a wholesale acceptance of their constructive criticisms and abandon what I have said to the contrary in the book. In the following, however, I shall try my best to reply to some of the questions raised in their comments.All three commentators raise questions...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Stephen Angle.Justin Tiwald - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):241-243.
Reply to Justin Tiwald.Stephen C. Angle - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):237-239.
Xunzi on Moral Expertise.Justin Tiwald - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):275-293.
Reply to Justin D'Arms and Lori Watson.Michael Slote - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):148-155.
Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-17

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yong Huang
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references