Husserl Studies:1-19 (forthcoming)

Normative notions are central to Husserl’s account of intentionality: intending an object is a normative achievement, essentially admitting of fulfillment or disappointment. So is teleology: intentional conscious life is inseparable from a horizontal orientation toward “ideas in the Kantian sense.” How are they related? Is teleology essential for intentionality as a normative achievement? Or, in Husserl’s way of putting it, do relative truths “demand” ideal truths? This article explores some reasons for agreeing with Husserl that this is indeed the case. In Sec. 2, I will identify a “normative turn” in Husserl’s account of the basic structure of perceptual intentionality and spell out the teleological character of this normative account. This sense of teleology is a minimal one. A more robust teleology, in the sense of an orientation toward infinite ideality, is then justified in Sec. 3 by virtue of its function in the constitution of genuine objectivity. In Sec. 4, I will turn to the noetic, especially the ego-oriented side of Husserl’s analysis, in order to clarify the normative force of infinite telos. All in all, I will argue that the normative and the teleological sides of the story are inextricably intertwined in Husserl’s account of intentional conscious life.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10743-021-09297-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,731
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Presence and Origin: On the Possibility of the Static-Genetic Distinction.Michael K. Shim - 2005 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 36 (2):129-147.
Epoché and Teleology: The Idea of Philosophy as ‘Infinite Task’ in Husserl.Shojiro Kotegawa - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 19:41-48.
How is a Phenomenology of Historical Worlds Possible?Tanja Staehler - 2019 - In Danilo Manca, Elisa Magrì, Dermot Moran & Alfredo Ferrarin (eds.), Hegel and Phenomenology. Springer Verlag. pp. 29-43.
Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology.Paul Ricœur - 1967 - Northwestern University Press.
Husserl and the Theological Question.James G. Hart - 2018 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 2 (2):122-135.
Intentionality and Normativity.Maxime Doyon - 2016 - Philosophy Today 60 (1):207-221.
Husserl’s Motivation and Method for Phenomenological Reconstruction.Matt Bower - 2014 - Continental Philosophy Review 47 (2):135-152.
Husserl on Eidetic Norms.Emanuela Carta - 2021 - Husserl Studies 37 (2):127-146.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,183,476 of 2,462,648 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #144,374 of 2,462,648 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes