MRI-based brain atrophy rates in ADNI phase 2: Acceleration and enrichment considerations for clinical trials

Abstract

© 2015 The Authors. The goal of this work was to assess statistical power to detect treatment effects in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging -derived brain biomarkers. We used unbiased tensor-based morphometry to analyze n = 5,738 scans, from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 participants scanned with both accelerated and nonaccelerated T1-weighted MRI at 3T. The study cohort included 198 healthy controls, 111 participants with significant memory complaint, 182 with early mild cognitive impairment and 177 late mild cognitive impairment, and 155 AD patients, scanned at screening and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The statistical power to track brain change in TBM-based imaging biomarkers depends on the interscan interval, disease stage, and methods used to extract numerical summaries. To achieve reasonable sample size estimates for potential clinical trials, the minimal scan interval was 6 months for LMCI and AD and 12 months for EMCI. TBM-based imaging biomarkers were not sensitive to MRI scan acceleration, which gave results comparable with nonaccelerated sequences. ApoE status and baseline amyloid-beta positron emission tomography data improved statistical power. Among healthy, EMCI, and LMCI participants, sample size requirements were significantly lower in the amyloid+/ApoE4+ group than for the amyloid-/ApoE4- group. ApoE4 strongly predicted atrophy rates across brain regions most affected by AD, but the remaining 9 of the top 10 AD risk genes offered no added predictive value in this cohort.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Hollow Hunt for Harms.Jacob Stegenga - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):481-504.
Clinical trials: deliberations on their essence and value.Franz A. Schelling - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (2):291-296.
Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-08

Downloads
3 (#1,686,544)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Xia Hua
Shanghai JiaoTong University
Maurice Bernstein
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references