“平等”视角下的人权、民权与国权 ——孙中山的“三民主义”之价值

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:155-160 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sun Yat-sen’s superior position in modern Chinese history is represented in the movement of the modernization of China with him as a representative went from the stage of ‘imitation’ to the stage of ‘creativity’. He put forward, China, as a country engaging in modernization late, could draw on Western experience and lessons, run (“突驾”) from capitalism directly into socialism, and realize ‘accomplishing both the political revolution and the social revolution at one stroke’. He designed the modernization program of ‘accomplishing both at one stroke’ as the Three People's Principles (Nationalism, Democracy and the People's Livelihood); each separately connects with Human rights, civil rights and national sovereignty pursued by modern Chinese and the essence of them develops around the value of equality approved by socialist thoughts of the day. According to Sun’s thinking: 1. People’s livelihood is the root of the Three People'sPrinciples, which involves most primary human rights --- right of survival because the value of human’s seeking survival necessarily directs to ‘equality and helping each other’, which is the law of the evolution of humanity. So the justice of socialism lies in ‘Leveling out the differences between the rich and the poor’, which can be realized with many ‘artificial’ elements such as nation and morality, etc. What must be done by People’s livelihood in contemporary China are ‘equalizing landownership’, ‘regulating capital’ and ‘developing industry’. 2. Democracy is the request of ‘civil rights’ in the sense of modern democracy. In the special national situation of China, it presents itself as the specific political framework ‘balancing people’s civil rights with elite administration’. 3. The essence of nationalism lies in constructing modern Chinese national country to save the nation from crises. Sun Yat-sen pointed out: First, the foundation on which Chinese nations build up their country is totally different from that of the West. So the country must take ‘collectivism’ as its value direction. Secondly, the ethos of the Chinese nation is different from that of the West. Chinese national country must take ‘morality first’ as the direction of value. Sun’s point of view is unique and single-eyed but contains unavoidable historical limits.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

一切人文知识的根本根据是什么.Dongkai Li - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:383-391.
The renaissance of traditional chinese learning.Shuguang Zhang - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):237-254.
The evolution of tianxia cosmology and its philosophical implications.Junping Liu - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):517-538.
Ai ssu-ch'I: The Apostle of chinese communism.Ignatius J. H. Ts'ao - 1972 - Studies in East European Thought 12 (1):2-36.
The source of the idea of equality in Confucian thought.Ruiquan Gao - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):486-505.
On the problem of the meaning of life in “Chinese Philosophy”.Xize Deng - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (4):609-627.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
32 (#431,931)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references