What We Owe Those Who Chat Woe: A Relational Lens for Mental Health Apps

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):77-80 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since ChatGPT’s debut in 2022, questions abound what ethical implications artificial intelligence (AI) platforms enabled by large language models (LLMs) have for medicine (Cohen 2023). In the area...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mental Health Apps: Innovations, Risks and Ethical Considerations.Kyriaki G. Giota - 2014 - E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks 3:19-23.
Relational Autonomy as a Theoretical Lens for Qualitative Health Research.Jennifer A. H. Bell - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2):69-92.
Mental expression and inner speech.Jesús López Campillo - 2023 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 38 (1):5-24.
Relational equality and health.Kristin Voigt & Gry Wester - 2015 - Social Philosophy and Policy 31 (2):204-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-11

Downloads
9 (#1,130,089)

6 months
8 (#209,681)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Should ChatGPT Mean for Bioethics?I. Glenn Cohen - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):8-16.

Add more references