Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):31-38 (2016)

Frances Howard-Snyder
Western Washington University
Martin Peterson argues for two interesting and appealing claims: multi-dimensionalism and degrees of rightness. Multi-dimensionalism is the view that more than one factor determines whether an act is right. According to Peterson’s multi-dimensionalism, these factors are not simply ways of achieving some greater aggregate good. Degrees of rightness is the view that some actions are more wrong or less right than others without being entirely wrong. It is of course, compatible with this, that some actions are right or wrong to a maximal degree, or entirely right or wrong. Multi-dimensionalism and degrees are taken to be intertwined. On Peterson’s view, if there were only one dimension, we wouldn’t need degrees; where only one dimension applies, an act is entirely right or entirely wrong. Peterson claims that degrees of rightness or wrongness arise only because there are multi-dimensions, and that an act cannot be entirely right if it is wrong on some dimension. I shall argue against both of these claims
Keywords Multi-dimensionalism  Degrees of wrong  Prima facie rightness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-015-9661-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The right and the good.W. Ross - 1932 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 39 (2):11-12.
“Cannot” Implies “Not Ought”.Frances Howard-Snyder - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):233-246.
Good and Bad Actions.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Degrees of Assertability.Sam Carter - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (1):19-49.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Multidimensional Consequentialism and Risk.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):49-57.
A Consequentialist Case for Rejecting the Right.Frances Howard-Snyder & Alastair Norcross - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:109-125.
Good and Bad Actions.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Epistemic Consequentialism.Jeffrey Dunn - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Infima of D.R.E. Degrees.Jiang Liu, Shenling Wang & Guohua Wu - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (1):35-49.
Bi-Isolation in the D.C.E. Degrees.Guohua Wu - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):409 - 420.
Scruton on Rightness of Proportion in Architecture.Rafael De Clercq - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (4):405-414.
Reply to Wallace's 'on Making Actions Morally Wrong'.Richard Swinburne - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):551 - 552.
Maximal Contiguous Degrees.Peter Cholak, Rod Downey & Stephen Walk - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):409-437.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #452,974 of 2,498,502 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,502 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes