Ethics 131 (4):727-753 (2021)

Authors
Christopher Howard
McGill University
Abstract
Many contemporary act consequentialists define facts about what we should do in terms of facts about what we should prefer. They claim that we should perform an action if and only if we should prefer its outcome to the outcome of any available alternative. Some of these theorists claim they can accommodate deontic constraints, such as a constraint against killing the innocent. I argue that they can’t. If there’s a constraint against killing, then when we can prevent five killings only by killing one, we shouldn’t kill—but we should prefer the outcome where we do.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/713952
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Attitudes de Dicto and de Se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
The Toxin Puzzle.Gregory S. Kavka - 1983 - Analysis 43 (1):33-36.
The Rejection of Consequentializing.Daniel Muñoz - 2021 - Journal of Philosophy 118 (2):79-96.
Utilitarianism and the Virtues.Philippa Foot - 1985 - Mind 94 (374):196-209.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How to Be an Epistemic Consequentialist.Daniel J. Singer - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):580-602.
Must Consequentialists Kill?Kieran Setiya - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy 115 (2):92-105.
Do Consequentialists Have One Thought Too Many?Elinor Mason - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):243-261.
Three Methods of Ethics. [REVIEW]Mark Van Roojen - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):721-723.
Rule Consequentialism and Moral Relativism in Advance.Ryan Jenkins - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Research.
A Dilemma for Rule-Consequentialism.Jussi Suikkanen - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (1):141-150.
Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism.D. Weinstein - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-15

Total views
110 ( #101,077 of 2,463,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #27,655 of 2,463,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes