Scepticism Toward Williamson's Epistemology of Thought Experiments

Philosophical Forum 47 (3-4):469-474 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Judgements, Expertise, and Counterfactuals.Sören Häggqvist - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):741-754.
Knowing the intuition and knowing the counterfactual.Jonathan Ichikawa - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (3):435 - 443.
Why Williamson should be a sceptic.Dylan Dodd - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):635–649.
Thought experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Thought and thought experiments.David Cole - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 45 (May):431-44.
Evidence and intuition.Yuri Cath - 2012 - Episteme 9 (4):311-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-16

Downloads
26 (#571,586)

6 months
4 (#657,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Hou
National Chung Cheng University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references