Norms of truth and meaning

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47:19-34 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely held that the normativity of truth and meaning puts a severe constraint on acceptable theories of these phenomena. This constraint is so severe, some would say, as to rule out purely ‘naturalistic’ or ‘factual’ accounts of them. In particular, it is commonly supposed that the deflationary view of truth and the use conception of meaning, in so far as they are articulated in entirely non-normative terms, must for that reason be inadequate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
61 (#253,035)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Horwich
New York University

Citations of this work

Truth and correct belief.Allan Gibbard - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):338–350.
Is meaning normative?Anandi Hattiangadi - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.
Minimalism and the Value of Truth.Michael P. Lynch - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):497 - 517.
Is truth a normative concept?Paul Horwich - 2018 - Synthese 195 (3):1127-1138.
Truth as the good in the way of belief.Michael P. Lynch - 2020 - American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (4):377-388.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and Objectivity.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Making it Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.
Wittgenstein on following a rule.John McDowell - 1984 - Synthese 58 (March):325-364.
The individual strikes back.Simon Blackburn - 1984 - Synthese 58 (March):281-302.

View all 10 references / Add more references