A Defense Of Minimalism

Synthese 126 (1-2):149-165 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to clarify and defend a certain ‘minimalist’ thesis about truth: roughly, that the meaning of the truth predicate is fixed by the schema, ’The proposition that p is true if and only if p’.1 The several criticisms of this idea to which I wish to respond are to be found in the recent work of Davidson, Field, Gupta, Richard, and Soames, and in a classic paper of Dummett’s.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confidence in unwarranted knowledge.David B. Martens - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (2):143 - 164.
Problems of Philosophy Problem #12: Epistemology from a strategic viewpoint.[author unknown] - 1998 - Synthese 116 (1):113-113.
In defense of epistemic arithmetic.Leon Horsten - 1998 - Synthese 116 (1):1-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
478 (#37,684)

6 months
16 (#138,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Horwich
New York University

Citations of this work

Deflationism about Truth.Bradley Armour-Garb, Daniel Stoljar & James Woodbridge - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Invariance as a basis for necessity and laws.Gila Sher - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):3945-3974.
The metaphysics of truth: anti-deflationism and substantial pluralism.Gila Sher - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (8):1494-1512.
In Defence of Radical Restrictionism.David Liggins - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (1):3-25.
Attitude Reports: Do You Mind the Gap?Berit Brogaard - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (1):93-118.

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references