Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning

Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):1-28 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper points out some problems with two recent logical systems – one due to Prakken and Sartor, the other due to Kowalski and Toni – designedfor the representation of defeasible arguments in general, but with a specialemphasis on legal reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
101 (#169,055)

6 months
18 (#135,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Horty
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

Defaults with Priorities.John Horty - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (4):367-413.
Moral particularism in the light of deontic logic.Xavier Parent - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):75-98.
Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms.Gabriella Pigozzi & Leendert van der Torre - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):189-217.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations