Philosophical Psychology 32 (6):831-852 (2019)

Jeroen Hopster
Utrecht University
The meta-ethical commitments of folk respondents – specifically their commitment to the objectivity of moral claims – have recently become subject to empirical scrutiny. Experimental findings suggest that people are meta-ethical pluralists: There is both inter- and intrapersonal variation with regard to people’s objectivist commitments. What meta-ethical implications, if any, do these findings have? I point out that current research does not directly address traditional meta-ethical questions: The methods used and distinctions drawn by experimenters do not perfectly match those of meta-ethicists. However, I go on to argue that, in spite of this mismatch, the research findings should be of interest to moral philosophers, including meta-ethicists. Not only do these findings extend the field of moral psychology with new data and hypotheses, but they also provide tentative evidence that touches on the adequacy of theses in moral semantics and moral metaphysics. Specifically, they put pressure on argum...
Keywords Experimental meta-ethics   moral psychology  moral objectivity  folk pluralism  moral realism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2019.1627304
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy.Antti Kauppinen - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):95 – 118.
Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers.John Bengson - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):495-532.
Moral Objectivism Across the Lifespan.James R. Beebe & David Sackris - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):912-929.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Anti-Realism.Richardn D. Joyce - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Moral Relativism.Christopher Gowans - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments.James R. Beebe - 2014 - In Jennifer Cole Wright & Hagop Sarkissian (eds.), Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 167-187.
From Punishment to Universalism.David Rose & Shaun Nichols - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (1):59-72.
Moral Objectivism Across the Lifespan.James R. Beebe & David Sackris - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):912-929.
Aspects of Folk Morality: Objectivism and Relativism.Hagop Sarkissian - 2016 - In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. London, UK: pp. 212-224.
Ronald Dworkin and the External Sceptic.Dale Smith - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2):433-457.
Folk Experiments.Jeffery W. Bentley - 2006 - Agriculture and Human Values 23 (4):451-462.
The Moral Judgment. [REVIEW]S. C. N. - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (3):485-486.
Moral Objectivism and a Punishing God.Hagop Sarkissian & Mark Phelan - 2019 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 80:1-7.
Facts About Natural Values.Robert Elliot - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (3):221 - 234.


Added to PP index

Total views
129 ( #89,334 of 2,498,797 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #67,603 of 2,498,797 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes