On the Objectivity of Norms of Argumentation

Abstract

This paper addresses the relationship between norms of reasoning and norms of politeness: To what extend can one be polite and reasonable at the same time? For this purpose, a normative system of reasoning is contrasted with a normative system of politeness. If and when they are in conflict: How can the communicator solve this tension?

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Normative theories of argumentation: are some norms better than others?Adam Corner & Ulrike Hahn - 2013 - Synthese 190 (16):3579-3610.
Commentary on Michael Hoppmann’s On the objectivity of Norms of Argumentation.Bart Garssen - unknown
Verbal Sparring and Apologetic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Contexts.Sylvia Burrow - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):235-262.
Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic.Jan A. van Laar - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):344-366.
Argumentation and the Force of Reasons.Robert C. Pinto - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (3):268-295.
Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries.Catherine Hundleby - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):238-262.
The Status of Rational Norms:: a Pragmatist Perspective.Maughn Gregory - 2001 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 21 (1):53-64.
Norms, normative principles, and explanation: On not getting is from ought.David Henderson - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):329-364.
Naturalised Epistemology without Norms.Jonathan Knowles - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):283-297.
Normative Conflict in Legal Systems: A Functional Analysis.Howard Hamner Hill - 1985 - Dissertation, Washington University
There Are Diachronic Norms of Rationality.Ulf Hlobil - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):38-45.
Norms, preferences, and conditional behavior.Cristina Bicchieri - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (3):297-313.
Conflict of legal norms: definition and varieties.Lars Lindahl & David Reidhav - unknown
Intention rationality.Michael E. Bratman - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):227-241.
Can a discursive pragmatism guarantee objectivity?: Habermas and Brandom on the correctness of norms.James Swindal - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1):113-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-20

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas E. Hill & Arnulf Zweig.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Searle - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1):59-61.
From Axiom to Dialogue.E. M. Barth & E. C. W. Krabbe - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (2):228-230.

View all 12 references / Add more references