Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329-352 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The main body of this paper assesses a leading recent theory of fairness, a theory put forward by John Broome. I discuss Broome's theory partly because of its prominence and partly because I think it points us in the right direction, even if it takes some missteps. In the course of discussing Broome's theory, I aim to cast light on the relation of fairness to consistency, equality, impartiality, desert, rights, and agreements. Indeed, before I start assessing Broome's theory, I discuss two very popular conceptions of fairness that contrast with his. One of these very popular conceptions identifies fairness with the equal and impartial application of rules. The other identifies fairness with all-things-considered moral rightness.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fairness.Brad Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
Fairness as comparative desert.S. Deon Wu - 2022 - Ratio 35 (4):321-332.
On Fairness and Claims.Patrick Tomlin - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (2):200-213.
Fairness between competing claims.Ben Saunders - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (1):41-55.
On Fairness.Craig L. Carr - 2000 - Routledge.
The Fairness in Algorithmic Fairness.Sune Holm - 2023 - Res Publica 29 (2):265-281.
Fairness and Aggregation.A. C. Paseau & Ben Saunders - 2015 - Utilitas 27 (4):460-469.
Equality as Comparative Fairness.Larry Temkin - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (1):43-60.


Added to PP

20 (#181,865)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brad Hooker
University of Reading

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references