The Overman and the Arahant: Models of Human Perfection in Nietzsche and Buddhism

Asian Philosophy 21 (1):53-69 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two models of human perfection proposed by Nietzsche and the Buddha are investigated. Both the overman and the arahant need practice and individual effort as key to their realization, and they share roughly the same conception of the self as a construction. However, there are also a number of salient differences. Though realizing it to be constructed, the overman does proclaim himself through his assertion of the will to power. The realization of the true nature of the self does not lead the overman to seek the way to be released from saṃsara as does the arahant. On the contrary, he rejoices in the eternally recurring situation. The arahant, however, has totally relinquished any attachment to the self, constructed or otherwise. The arahant does not care about the Eternal Recurrence, as he only focuses on the present moment. Finally, they are both beyond good and evil, but in a substantively different way.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-19

Downloads
1,809 (#5,031)

6 months
392 (#4,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Soraj Hongladarom
Chulalongkorn University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The will to power.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1924 - London,: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Edited by Walter Arnold Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale.
The will to power.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1967 - New York,: Random House. Edited by Walter Arnold Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale.
Nietzsche, life as literature.Alexander Nehamas - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The portable Nietzsche.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1954 - New York: Penguin Books.

View all 32 references / Add more references