The Bioethicist Who Cried “Synthetic Biology”: An Analysis of the Function of Bioterrorism Predictions in Bioethics

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (2):230-238 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

:This article analyzes a specter that has haunted bioethics almost since its inception, namely the specter of the misuse of biotechnology by maleficent agents bent on mass destruction, or the complete eradication of human kind and life as we know it. The article provides a general account of why bioethicists cry “catastrophic bioterrorism potential” when new biotechnologies emerge, and an analysis of the arguments that flow from the prediction, especially in relation to synthetic biology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Building New Bioethical Practices through Feminist Pedagogies.Sara Giordano - 2016 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 9 (1):81-103.
Synthetic Biology, Genome Editing, and the Risk of Bioterrorism.Marko Ahteensuu - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1541-1561.
Synthetic Biology and Synthetic Knowledge.Christophe Malaterre - 2013 - Biological Theory (8):346–356.
From Synthetic Bioethics to One Bioethics: A Reply to Critics.Paul B. Thompson - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (2):215-224.
The Troubled Identity of the Bioethicist.Nicky Priaulx - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):6-19.
Synthetic Biology: A Challenge to Mechanical Explanations in Biology?Michel Morange - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (4):543-553.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-06

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations