Suicide

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 2:72-85 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am concerned with the subject as an ethico-religious problem. Is suicide all right or isn't it; and if it isn't, why not?The question should not be assumed to be susceptible of an answer in the way the question whether arsenic is poisonous is susceptible of an answer. Moreover in the case of arsenic the question what it is, and the question whether it is poisonous, are separable questions: you can know that arsenic is poisonous without having analysed its nature. But to know or believe that suicide is objectionable is to have analysed its nature or construed its significance in one way rather than another.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
36 (#434,037)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Psychopathy: Morally Incapacitated Persons.Heidi Maibom - 2017 - In Thomas Schramme & Steven Edwards (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer. pp. 1109-1129.
Foreword.G. N. A. Vesey - 1970 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 4:vii-xvi.
On Goodrich's "The Morality of Killing".David West - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (173):233 - 236.
Foreword.G. N. A. Vesey - 1970 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 4:vii-xvi.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references