Revenge without redundancy: Functional outcomes do not require discrete adaptations for vengeance or forgiveness

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):22-23 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We question whether the postulated revenge and forgiveness systems constitute true adaptations. Revenge and forgiveness are the products of multiple motivational systems and capacities, many of which did not exclusively evolve to support deterrence. Anger is more aptly construed as an adaptation that organizes independent mechanisms to deter transgressors than as the mediator of a distinct revenge adaptation.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The fuzzy reality of perceived harms.Sara Konrath & Irene Cheung - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):26-27.
Pathways to abnormal revenge and forgiveness.Pat Barclay - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):17-18.
Revenge and forgiveness or betrayal blindness?Sasha Johnson-Freyd & Jennifer J. Freyd - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):23 - 24.
A systems view on revenge and forgiveness systems.Tyler J. Wereha & Timothy P. Racine - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):39-39.
No such thing as genuine forgiveness?Mark G. McCoy & Todd K. Shackelford - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):28-29.
How Religion Promotes Forgiveness: The Case of Turkish Muslims.Ali Ayten - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (3):411-425.


Added to PP

13 (#1,042,339)

6 months
5 (#648,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Shame in Two Cultures: Implications for Evolutionary Approaches.Daniel Fessler - 2004 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 4 (2):207-262.

Add more references