European Journal of Political Theory 17 (4):411-431 (2018)

Jared Holley
Cambridge University
This article argues that in order to understand the form of modern political freedom envisioned by Rousseau, we have to understand his theory of taste as refined Epicureanism. Rousseau saw the division of labour and corrupt taste as the greatest threats to modern freedom. He identified their cause in the spread of vulgar Epicureanism – the frenzied pursuit of money, vanity and sexual gratification. In its place, he advocated what he called ‘the Epicureanism of reason’, or refined Epicureanism. Materially grounded on an equitable proportion of needs and faculties, this was a hedonist theory of self-command designed to cultivate the temperate enjoyment of sensual pleasure. I argue that Rousseau hoped that a shift from vulgar to refined Epicureanism would secure political freedom in modernity by grounding the politics of the general will in an economics of balanced growth and a reinvigorated appreciation of natural beauty. This perspective provides a new way of both clarifying the role of economic justice and aesthetic judgment in Rousseau's republican state theory, and of assessing the consistency of his moral and political thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474885118788963
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Natural Right and History (Chicago, 1953).Leo Strauss - 1953 - The Correspondence Between Ethical Egoists and Natural Rights Theorists is Considerable Today, as Suggested by a Comparison of My" Recent Work in Ethical Egoism," American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):1-15.
Voting the General Will.Melissa Schwartzberg - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (3):403-423.
What Is the General Will?Gopal Sreenivasan - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):545 - 581.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Figurative Foundations of Rousseau's Politics.Emma Planinc - forthcoming - Modern Intellectual History:1-26.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Eighteenth-Century Epicureanism and Rousseau on Liberty.Jared Holley - 2011 - History of European Ideas 37 (1):81-84.
Rousseau, the General Will, and Individual Liberty.Philip J. Kain - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (3):315 - 334.
Epicureanism in the Early Modern Period.Catherine Wilson - 2009 - In James Warren (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 266.
Rousseau and Republicanism.Annelien de Dijn - 2018 - Political Theory 46 (1):59-80.
Rousseau's Gift to Geneva.Helena Rosenblatt - 2006 - Modern Intellectual History 3 (1):65-73.
Rousseau, Nature, and the Problem of the Good Life.Laurence D. Cooper - 1999 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Rousseau, Nature, and the Problem of the Good Life.Laurence D. Cooper - 1999 - Pennsylvania State University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #636,293 of 2,507,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes