Perceived (In)justice of Public Land Acquisition

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):167-184 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many studies have addressed the justice of public land acquisition, but few studies have addressed the question of what landowners perceive as just. Individual perceptions drive an important part of the social and scientific debates on legitimate and just land acquisition. This article addresses this gap by studying landowners’ and land purchasers’ perceptions of just land acquisition. We did this by uncovering the prevailing discourse on just land acquisition and studying the values that shaped people’s perceptions of just land acquisition. The results showed that perceptions of justice are based on the values of lawfulness, decentness and equality. These values were translated into different norms that resulted in expectations pertaining to just land acquisition. Insight into the different perceptions and the prevailing discourse of just land acquisition and their underlying values increases the understanding of land acquisition processes and land policy strategies. First, it becomes apparent that land acquisition has an essential element of injustice that cannot be avoided by a good process or a just compensation fee. Second, insight in different discourses provides valuable input for debates on just land acquisition. Third, such insight shows that money is not always a sufficient means of indemnification. The combination of sufficient financial compensation, the opportunity of a new location, attractive selling conditions and accurate and open process are all important requisites to ensure that public land acquisition is perceived by the majority of landowners as just

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Perceived (In)justice of Public Land Acquisition.S. M. Holtslag-Broekhof, R. Marwijk, R. Beunen & J. S. C. Wiskerke - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):167-184.
Protection of Collective-owned Land Property and Misery Index of Eminent Domain.Guang-hua Zhu & Jian-wei Gao - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:59-68.
Human Rights Against Land Grabbing? A Reflection on Norms, Policies, and Power.Poul Wisborg - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (6):1199-1222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-25

Downloads
34 (#123,329)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.
Understanding Institutional Diversity.Elinor Ostrom - 2007 - Environmental Values 16 (1):129-132.

Add more references