Nihilistic Praxis: Adorno and Benjamin on Mutilated Thinking

Idealistic Studies 39 (1-3):99-113 (2009)


This essay explores similarities in the arguments of Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin in order to claim, against the commonplace assumptionthat social actionism is the only legitimate mode of political engagement, that actionism bears within it both fear and refusal of critical thought. In contrast, theauthor argues that the works of these two thinkers offer an alternative approach to political regeneration: The attentiveness of speculative thought and interpretation to distortion, to the accumulated garbage of history, and to thought’s own powerlessness or lack of efficacy in the world is necessary for a realization of the possibilities for real political change. On this reading, speculative philosophical thought is tasked with developing the capacity to sustain remembrance of the horrors of the past and the demand for critical thought placed by those horrors upon our own mutilated capacity for thinking

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

13 (#776,146)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Holt
University of North Texas

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations