Erratum to: Research Ethics in the Assessment of PhD Theses: Footprint or Footnote?

Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (4):341-341 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.
Erratum: Soutenances de thèses.[author unknown] - 1966 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (2):308-308.
Erratum: Thèses de doctorat.[author unknown] - 1902 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 10 (4):12-12.
Erratum: Thèses de doctorat.[author unknown] - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (3):11-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-03

Downloads
23 (#644,212)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references