Democratic Authority From the Outside Looking In

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (3):1-16 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In THE CONSTITUTION OF EQUALITY, Thomas Christiano takes on the question of why decisions that have been democratically arrived at should be treated as authoritative even if we do not agree with them. A key element of that argument is the concept of a “common world”. Christiano takes the connections between people produced by subjection to the same state as the paradigmatic case of a common world, and seems to assume that state-based common worlds take normative priority over common-world-like connections produced by other social and institutional structures. This identification of the worlds created by states and other groupings is not necessary to the function that common worlds perform in Christiano’s argument, and there are good reasons for resisting such identification. These reasons become most apparent when we consider that the problems that minorities within a state face typically reflect ongoing injustice in the terms of their incorporation into the common world produced by the state that encompasses them. States’ capacities to produce and maintain common worlds depends on an international institutional context that accepts and reinforces exclusive jurisdiction with respect to a territory and population. This international context raises several questions: whether state-based groupings ought to be privileged in this way; how boundaries must be drawn for such privilege to be defensible; and what the proper relationship is between decisions by state-based and other groupings. The Constitution of Equality offers interesting resources for grappling with these questions. But we must be willing to think beyond the state.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority.Christopher S. King - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.
Raz on Authority and Democracy.David Rondel - 2012 - Dialogue 51 (2):211-230.
Nonideal democratic authority: The case of undemocratic elections.Alexander S. Kirshner - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (3):257-276.
L’autorité Éducative À L’épreuve De La Démocratisation De La Vie Scolaire.Tonyeme Bilakani - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (1):106-129.
Democratic Equality and Political Authority.Daniel Viehoff - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (4):337-375.
Democratic Education: Revised Edition.Amy Gutmann - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
Truth, Inquiry and Democratic Authority in the Climate Debate.Phillip Deen - 2014 - Public Affairs Quarterly 28 (4):375-394.
Democracy, Political Power, and Authority.Mark Haugaard - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):1049-1074.
Democracy, political power, and authority.Mark Haugaard - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (4):1049-1074.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
7 (#1,201,127)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cindy Holder
University of Victoria

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

13 Internal minorities and indigenous self-determination.Margaret Moore - 2005 - In Avigail Eisenberg & Jeff Spinner-Halev (eds.), Minorities Within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 271.
Self-determination as a universal human right.Cindy Holder - 2006 - Human Rights Review 7 (4):5-18.

Add more references