Comment: Reframing the Conceptual Diversity of Social Appraisal and Social Referencing

Emotion Review 9 (3):265-267 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The comment discusses the common ground and differences of the contribution of Walle, Reschke, and Knothe, as well as that of Clément and Dukes in their efforts to conceptually connect an important concept from infancy research, namely that of social referencing, with an important one from emotion research on adults, that of social appraisal. The distinction between social referencing and affective observation under the generic concept of social appraisal could be worthwhile for differentiating implicit and explicit impacts of a model’s behavior on a child’s emotional development.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comment: Respecifying Emotional Influence.Brian Parkinson - 2017 - Emotion Review 9 (3):263-265.
Comment: Journeys to the Center of Emotion.Brian Parkinson - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (2):180-184.
Individualism and cognitive development.Philip Gerrans - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):107-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-05

Downloads
16 (#771,273)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?