Blindsight in debates about qualia

Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (5):54-71 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Blindsight is a hot topic in philosophy, especially in discussions of consciousness. Here I critically examine various attempts to bring blindsight to bear on debates about qualia -- the raw constituents of consciousness. I argue that blindsight does not unequivocally support any particular theory of qualia. It does, however, vindicate the view that there are qualia, despite arguments -- most notably by Daniel Dennett -- to the contrary

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Qualifying Qualia Through the Skyhook Test.Tere Vadén - 2001 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):149-169.
Dennett on qualia: The case of pain, smell and taste.Drakon Nikolinakos - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (4):505 – 522.
Qualia.Torin Alter - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
The qualities of qualia.David de Léon - 1997 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 34 (1):121-138.
Naturalizing qualia, destroying qualia. P. - 2000 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 35 (76):65-83.
Qualia that it is right to Quine.Manuel Garcia-Carpintero - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):357-377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
134 (#132,336)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references